Back to blog
Product··5 min read

deetech™ vs Sensity AI: Which Is Better for Insurance Claims?

deetech™ vs Sensity AI for insurance claims: a forensic-investigation heritage versus an insurer-first workflow for photos, documents, audio and video.

A split testing laboratory with two analysis pipelines processing identical insurance claim files simultaneously

Sensity AI is one of the longest-running deepfake detection companies in the market. Founded in 2018 as Deeptrace, it built its reputation on forensic analysis for law enforcement, government and investigative teams.

deetech™ is insurer-first. Its workflow is built around claims: a case workspace, document analysis, forensic reports and SIU review, across the photos, documents, audio and video that arrive with a claim.

Both are technically serious products. The question for insurance buyers is which one fits the day-to-day reality of a claims department.

Sensity AI at a Glance

Sensity is based in Amsterdam. In January 2026 it closed a US$2.1 million round led by Auriga Cyber Ventures, bringing total capital raised to US$3.2 million, and reported that it tripled revenue and reached profitability in 2025 (Sensity). In July 2026 it was selected for €4.9 million in European Innovation Council funding (Biometric Update).

According to its website, Sensity:

  • Analyzes video, images and audio, with pixel-level, voice and file-forensic analysis
  • States 98% accuracy on public datasets
  • Produces forensic reports it describes as court-ready, with confidence scores, visual indicators and audit trails
  • Reports saving about 35 minutes of manual review per case
  • Is deployed in more than 30 countries, via web app, API and SDK, in the cloud or on-premises

Its core markets are law enforcement, government and judicial users, KYC and identity verification, and media. It also names banks and insurers among its customers, and has written about AI-generated images in insurance fraud.

Sensity’s heritage is forensic investigation, and that is a genuine strength when a single contested item needs deep examination.

deetech™: Built Around Claims Workflows

deetech™ approaches the problem from the claims side. Rather than adapting an investigation tool to insurance, it is organized around the evidence claims teams receive and the people who review it.

Every evidence type in a claim

  • Photos. Analysis for synthetic or manipulated-media indicators, with configured forensic signals that show investigators what drove a result.
  • Documents. Deterministic structural, arithmetic and fabrication checks, edit-history analysis, confidence-gated OCR, and pixel forensics on supported scans, for repair quotes, invoices, receipts and certificates. Document analysis looks for manipulation. It does not verify identity.
  • Audio. Uploaded-audio analysis for synthetic speech in recorded statements and voice notes. deetech™ ranked #1 of 23 systems on the Podonos audio deepfake benchmark (studio track), with 99.56% accuracy across 4,524 clips scored against labels only Podonos holds.
  • Video. Uploaded-video analysis for dashcam, CCTV and walkthrough footage.

Evidence context

  • C2PA content-credential verification. Missing credentials are treated as unknown, not as proof of a fake.
  • Reused-photo matching. Every uploaded image is fingerprinted and matched against your organization’s earlier submissions, flagging exact and near-duplicate copies (resized, re-compressed or lightly edited) that turn up again in another claim. Reverse image search through configured providers then checks for photos lifted from the web.

Investigation workflow

  • Case workspace for organizing a claim’s evidence and analyses.
  • Forensic PDF reports with plain-language findings, methodology and limitations for SIU investigators and retained experts.

Enterprise options

  • Live call detection, and live meeting detection on Zoom, Microsoft Teams and Google Meet, for claims interviews and video inspections.
  • On-premises, air-gapped and private deployment.

Detailed Comparison

Screening Volume and Speed

Claims operations need two things at once: routine screening of incoming media, and deeper review of the items that warrant it.

deetech™ is designed for both. Files can be submitted through the dashboard or API as claims arrive. Images often return in seconds; video and deeper analyses run asynchronously and can take minutes, with signed webhooks notifying your system when results are ready. The batch API accepts up to 20 image, audio or document files per request on standard plans and up to 100 on Enterprise. Flagged items then move into the case workspace for investigator review.

Accuracy on Claims Media

Sensity’s 98% figure is stated for public datasets. Public benchmarks are useful, but claims media is different:

  • Compression from messaging apps, email and web portals
  • Low-resolution captures from older phones
  • Metadata stripping by messaging platforms and email clients
  • Environmental noise: poor lighting, reflections, motion blur in dashcam footage
  • Document scans: photos of paperwork taken at angles and in varying quality

The only performance result deetech™ publishes is the Podonos audio benchmark above; image, video and document benchmarks are available under NDA, so talk to us. Buyers should compare both products on a representative, lawfully handled sample of their own claims media.

Integration

deetech™ integrates with claims platforms through a customer-implemented REST API and signed webhooks:

  • Guidewire ClaimCenter: customer integration through Guidewire and deetech™ APIs
  • Duck Creek Claims: customer integration through Duck Creek and deetech™ APIs
  • Sapiens ClaimsPro: customer integration through Sapiens and deetech™ APIs
  • Custom systems: REST API and webhook integration

Your team or implementation partner places deetech™ results in the claims or SIU system you already use. Investigators can also work directly in the deetech™ dashboard and case workspace.

Forensic Reporting

Sensity’s forensic reporting is a genuine strength, shaped by years of work with investigators and judicial users.

deetech™ reports are written for insurance review:

  • Plain-language summaries for claims staff alongside technical detail
  • Methodology and limitations for retained experts
  • Supporting forensic signals and visual indicators where available
  • Export for investigation files and case records

deetech™ provides automated scores and summaries as review inputs, not sufficient grounds for an automated decision. Reports document available findings for investigators and experts, but do not guarantee regulatory alignment, evidentiary reliability, or legal admissibility.

Pricing

Sensity prices through direct engagement with its sales team.

deetech™ uses credits. The free Pilot plan includes 50 credits on signup and 10 per month after that. Enterprise plans start at 100,000 credits a month and are negotiated. A Scan uses 1 credit and a Deep Scan uses 2, with audio and video charged per started minute. Deeper analysis can be reserved for the items that warrant it.

When Sensity AI Makes Sense

Sensity is a strong choice for:

  • Law enforcement and judicial users investigating specific deepfake-related crimes
  • Legal teams that want forensic analysis for contested evidence
  • KYC and identity-verification teams defending onboarding and video-call checks
  • Media organizations verifying specific pieces of content

When deetech™ Is the Better Choice

deetech™ is the stronger choice for insurance carriers that want:

  • One product for photos, documents, audio and video in claims
  • Document manipulation checks on quotes, invoices and certificates
  • A case workspace and forensic reports built for SIU and expert review
  • Screening of incoming claims media, with deeper analysis where it’s warranted
  • Credit-based pricing that starts with a free Pilot plan
  • Live claims-call and video-inspection coverage, or on-premises deployment, on an Enterprise plan

The Verdict

Sensity AI and deetech™ are both capable detection platforms, with different starting points. Sensity comes from forensic investigation. deetech™ comes from the claims workflow.

For insurers, the deciding factor is usually fit: the evidence types you receive, the documents you need to check, and how your claims and SIU teams review findings. Test both on your own claims media and see which fits.

The deepfake detection FAQ covers common questions about false positives and processing speed. For a broader view of the market, see our top deepfake detection tools for insurance in 2026.


To see how deetech™ helps insurers and claims teams verify the media behind every claim, visit our solutions page or request a demo.

Deepfake DetectionClaimsProductForensics